Does the Federal Government Really Believe There Are No Dangerous Bioeffects From EMF Exposure?

1. not enough research has been done on EMF Bioeffects to determine the potential risk, or
2. plenty of research has been done to determine that there is no risk.

The Ambiguity

A good example of disagreement is the NCRP pre-release leak of "recommendations." This is a group of people working on THE SAME REPORT, who completely disagreed on what the conclusions should be. Imagine people in different agencies with mutually-exclusive interests, or people in Industry, with jobs, and the future of whole technologies at stake? (Here I am assuming the leak originated with someone inside who thought the final recommendations would not be consistant with the data.)

The people who make up the Federal Government do not agree on EMR Bioeffects, so how can the Federal Government appear to be consistent? Here are some contradictory positions taken by various US Government agencies, or agents.

• National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, report, or press release, -- no danger,
• National Council on Radiation Protection, -- danger -- or maybe not,
• National EMF Advisory Committee, calls for Continued Research on Electric and Magnetic Field Health Effects, -- danger, "We take this action because, after perusal of the pre-publication NAS/NRC report released October 31, 1996, we conclude that neither the press release nor the Executive Summary of the report adequately reflects the conclusions to be found in the body of the report. ... Contrary to reports in the popular press. the NAS/NRC report does not state that extremely low magnetic fields are safe. Rather, the report concludes that there is an unexplained, but statistically reliable and robust association between power transmission and distribution systems and childhood cancer and that continued research is necessary."

Weapons Research

For decades, the Federal Government has funded research into various uses of EMF energy in anti-personnel applications; both for time of war, and time of peace. Probably the most famous is the CIA's MKULTRA project, which sought to establish various methodologies for mind-control applications, using everything from "brainwashing" to "microwaves." Unfortunately, much of the documentation from MKULTRA was destroyed; allegedly because the CIA was concerned about the public perception of their research goals, and to maintain proprietary control of all potentially valuable results.

Is it possible that the Federal Government now has precisely the same concern? That if the real body of evidence was revealed, the nature of the original research -- morally and ethically degenerate goals -- would be brought to light? This is a disgusting thought, but not without historical precedent.

For some interesting reading on this subject, check out:

• [2-9-97]
  New The Alternative HAARP Page
  "If you prefer alternative views about HAARP, other than Uncle Sam's assurances, peruse further. These views are presented for your info: they may or may not reflect the beliefs of the author of this document. Use your gray matter!." A comprehensive site on HAARP.

• [2-9-97]
  New Unconventional Beam and Damage Effects
  At the Weapons Sciences Directorate, Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center (MRDEC), U.S. Army Missile Command (MICOM)

• DOE Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
  Information about MKULTRA and CIA experimentation without consent, at the Department of Energy. An excerpt: "The CIA program, known principally by the codename MKULTRA, began in 1950 and was motivated largely in response to alleged Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean uses of mind-control techniques on U.S. prisoners of war in Korea. Because most of the MKULTRA records were deliberately destroyed in 1973 by order of then-Director of Central Intelligence Richard Helms, it is impossible to have a complete understanding of the more than 150 individually funded research projects sponsored by MKULTRA and the related CIA programs.[77] Central Intelligence Agency documents suggest that radiation was part of the MKULTRA program and that the agency considered and explored uses of radiation for these purposes.[78] However, the documents that remain from MKULTRA, at least as currently brought to light, do not show that the CIA itself carried out any of these proposals on human subjects."

• Electromagnetic Studies at the Leading Edge Research Group.
  Some very interesting EMF weapon and mind-control information. "Leading Edge Research Group is a planetary analysis organization that has existed since 1988, and was formerly known as Nevada Aerial Research Group. Since that time, it has released over 15,000 pages of research information worldwide through the forum of the Leading Edge Interational Research Journal and the famous Matrix books. Leading Edge Research Group interacts with many other research groups and organizations, such as ... Microwave News ... "

• Angels Don't Play this HAARP Earthpulse Press.
  HAARP stands for High frequency Active Aroural Research Project. "In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims: 'The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations... Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. [emphasis mine - ed.] In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop...'" Rhetorical question: Does this sound like they don't know anything about EMF? (Check out the Navy's official HAARP page.)

• More info on HAARP.
  What is HAARP? - three short articles:
  1. HAARP fact sheet,
  2. Is HAARP a Star Wars weapon?,
  3. Monster in the Wilderness

• EMF Warfare EMFs used as weapons.
  Chapter 15 of Dr. Robert Becker's book, The Body Electric. "The Soviets have led the way in learning about the risks of electropollution, and, as we have seen, they've apparently been the first to harness those dangers for malicious intent. However, the spectrum of potential weapons extends far beyond the limits of the Moscow signal, and Americans have been actively exploring some of them for many years. Most or all of the following EMR effects can be scaled up or down for use against individuals or whole crowds and armies..."